
Benchmarking
Reimagining Accountable Care Programs for Medicare
Modernizing Benchmarks to Improve Recruitment, Retention, and Program Integrity
Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) incentivize health care providers to deliver high-quality and cost-efficient care, rewarding providers by allowing them to share in the savings they create by finding ways to improve health and reduce costs. Savings are achieved by spending less than an assigned benchmark, providing a spending target for providers to meet, assuming quality is at least maintained.
Unfortunately, the way CMS sets these benchmarks does not represent how health care is delivered today. The Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) uses past spending data to set payment limits, and Medicare Advantage uses local Medicare spending to compare costs. These methods can be unfair or outdated, leading some organizations to leave MSSP because they feel the system works against them. Recent changes aimed at improving benchmarking for MSSP payments have made the program more complicated, causing even more concerns and making it harder for new organizations to join. For ACOs to become a market standard, different benchmarking approaches are needed to improve recruitment and retention across Medicare.
By The Numbers
11 Million
number of beneficiaries covered by MSSP ¹
50%
share of Medicare beneficiaries covered by MA ²
$2.1 billion
reported net savings achieved by MSSP in 2023 ³
561 to 517
reduction in number of ACOs participating in the MSSP from 2018 to 2020 ⁴

Redesigning Benchmarking Policies
The Accelerator is building consensus among stakeholders and developing a step-by-step plan to help the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) improve its benchmarking policies, ultimately lowering costs and improving patient outcomes by increasing participation from high-quality providers. Our approach includes:
-
Collaborating with ACOs, insurance plans, policymakers, and other experts to find a practical way to improve how Medicare sets payment benchmarks.
-
Building a feasible plan to define benchmarks based on real experience and inputs from these groups — especially those currently or previously involved in MA or MSSP.
-
Building consensus on the proposed plan through outreach and conferences to increase understanding and support.
-
Testing and improving the plan by learning from real-world experiences and using shared data to see how well it could work in practice.
Duke-Margolis Project Team

Audrey Ford, MS
Policy Research Associate

Kylie Brown, MPH
Policy Analyst

Rachel Bonesteel, MSc
Senior Policy Analyst
.jpg)
Frank McStay, MPA
Assistant Research Director
West Health Project Team

Namrata Uberoi, PhD, MPH
Director, Health Policy

Chris Crowley, PhD
Director of Strategy, West Health Institute
Project Collaborators

Michael McWilliams, MD, PhD
Warren Alpert Foundation Professor of Health Care Policy, Professor of Medicine, Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School

Purva Rawal, PhD
Former Chief Strategy Officer, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation